Monday, May 19, 2008

Wedding Blog

I recently had a reader send me her blog, Mr. Jazz Man's Ring. The blog is to help sell CDs of her fiance's music so that he would be able to "happily and willingly" buy her a ring.

Apparently, my reader isn't a long time reader. I don't really think a ring is necessary to to be engaged. In fact, my ring finger has remained naked during our entire engagement.

I am not one to really judge or criticize others. So I decided to share it with my readers. What do you think? Would you help someone so that they could buy an engagement ring?

2 comments:

Golightly said...

nope I wouldn't. I'm a firm believer that you do not need a ring to be engaged. Sure, its great, but not neccessary. Its about love; not how much money your fiance could afford on a diamond. And I'd much rather spend that money on the wedding

Anonymous said...

IMHO engaged is when two people have commitment to each other and are planning a wedding.
There are some people who do not want to wear a diamond, i.e, for political reasons as there is no such thing as a conflict-free diamond.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...